Dear Colleagues! This is Asrar Qureshi’s Blog Post #1336 for Pharma Veterans. Pharma Veterans Blogs are published by Asrar Qureshi on its dedicated site https://pharmaveterans.com. Please email to pharmaveterans2017@gmail.com for publishing your contributions here.
Preamble
Why New Management Ideas Fall on Deaf Ears in Pakistan, and What Organisations Must Do About It.
Pakistan has no shortage of intelligent managers, experienced professionals, business graduates, consultants, trainers and management conferences. New management ideas are regularly discussed: strategic leadership, empowerment, delegation, performance management, innovation, digital transformation, employee engagement, accountability, succession planning and organisational agility. Yet, in many organisations, the distance between discussing these ideas and actually practising them remains considerable.
A management concept may be enthusiastically received during a seminar, included in a strategic plan, or announced by the CEO. A few months later, however, the organisation is often operating exactly as before.
Why does this happen? Why do management innovations that have improved organizational performance elsewhere frequently struggle to gain acceptance in Pakistan?
The problem is not necessarily a shortage of knowledge. It is more often a combination of organisational culture, leadership behaviour, institutional weaknesses, economic pressures and resistance to change.
Hierarchical culture: Authority is valued more than initiative
One of the biggest obstacles is the deeply hierarchical structure of many Pakistani organisations.
Decision-making authority is concentrated at the top. Employees are expected to follow instructions rather than question assumptions, challenge established practices or propose alternatives. In such an environment, ideas like empowerment, decentralisation and employee participation face an immediate contradiction.
Management may announce that employees should take ownership, but when someone makes an independent decision that does not produce the expected result, the individual may be criticised for exceeding authority.
The message becomes clear: take initiative when it is convenient, but do not make mistakes.
Leadership often rewards loyalty more than competence
In most organisations, professional advancement depends as much on personal relationships, loyalty and access to senior management as on demonstrated performance.This discourages the introduction of new management ideas.
A competent employee who challenges an established process may be perceived as difficult. Someone who agrees with senior management may be considered dependable, even when their contribution is limited.
This creates an environment in which people learn to protect their positions rather than improve the organisation. New management approaches such as merit-based promotions, transparent performance appraisals and competency-based leadership selection can threaten established informal arrangements.
Short-term thinking dominates long-term organisational development
Many businesses in Pakistan operate under significant financial and economic pressure.
Inflation, currency fluctuations, high financing costs, energy prices, taxation, regulatory uncertainty and changing consumer purchasing power create genuine challenges.
Under these conditions, management attention naturally gravitates towards immediate concerns:
- Achieving this month’s sales target.
- Controlling operating expenses.
- Managing cash flow.
- Meeting production requirements.
- Resolving urgent operational problems.
Longer-term initiatives such as leadership development, employee engagement, digital transformation, succession planning and organisational restructuring are frequently postponed.
The irony is that these initiatives could help organisations become more resilient and productive over time.
Management ideas are imported without adapting them to local realities
Many management concepts originate in developed economies with different institutional, economic and cultural environments. Concepts such as open communication, flat organisational structures, employee empowerment, flexible working and participative decision-making may work well in certain organisations abroad.
But introducing them without considering local circumstances can lead to disappointment.
Managers themselves may resist change
One uncomfortable reality is that resistance to management innovation often comes from middle and senior management.
Consider the introduction of Management by Objectives (MBO). The system requires managers to agree on clear objectives, establish measurable targets, monitor progress and evaluate performance against results. For organisations accustomed to informal supervision, this can be unsettling.
It introduces transparency. It makes responsibilities clearer. It becomes easier to identify whether targets were achieved and where performance gaps exist. Some managers may resist because they are uncomfortable with accountability. Others may lack the skills required to set SMART objectives, coach employees or conduct performance reviews. In some cases, they may simply prefer familiar practices.
Organisations confuse introducing a system with changing behaviour
This is perhaps one of the most common reasons why management initiatives fail.
An organisation introduces a new performance appraisal form, but managers continue evaluating employees according to personal impressions. It launches a leadership-development programme, but senior leaders continue making every decision themselves. It introduces an employee-engagement survey, but does nothing about the issues employees raise. It announces a digital transformation programme, but employees continue relying on manual procedures.
The organisation has introduced a system, but the underlying behaviour has not changed.
Failure is punished, discouraging innovation
Innovation involves experimentation. Not every new idea will succeed. However, in organisations where mistakes are treated as personal failures, employees become reluctant to experiment. They prefer established procedures, even when those procedures are inefficient. This is particularly damaging in industries facing technological disruption, changing customer expectations and competitive pressures.
Pharmaceutical companies, for example, must adapt to developments in digital marketing, data analytics, artificial intelligence, changing healthcare needs and new approaches to customer engagement. An organisation that discourages experimentation risks becoming less competitive.
Weak governance allows old practices to survive
Management innovation is difficult to sustain when organisational governance is weak.
In family-owned businesses, for example, professional management systems may be introduced but subsequently weakened by informal instructions, personal preferences or decisions outside established authority structures. In other organisations, boards may approve strategies without consistently monitoring implementation.
When accountability is unclear, new management practices can easily lose momentum.
What Pakistani organisations should do differently
The answer is not to introduce more management theories, conduct more seminars or distribute more management books. The answer is to create organisations that can absorb new ideas, translate them into practical systems and sustain behavioural change.
I would recommend the following seven-point approach.
- Start with real problems: Identify operational or organisational weaknesses before selecting a management solution.
- Secure leadership commitment: CEOs and senior managers must visibly practise the behaviours they expect from others.
- Introduce change gradually: Begin with pilot projects rather than organisation-wide announcements.
- Build managerial capability: Train managers in leadership, coaching, delegation and performance management.
- Establish accountability: Assign clear ownership, deadlines and measurable outcomes.
- Recognise positive behaviour: Reward collaboration, innovation, initiative and results.
- Measure implementation: Review whether actual behaviour and business performance have changed.
Sum Up
Pakistan does not lack management knowledge. Its universities teach modern management concepts. Business schools produce qualified graduates. Consultants introduce international practices. Professional associations organise conferences and training programmes.
Yet the real test of management is not how many ideas an organisation knows. It is how many it successfully converts into everyday practice. A new management concept cannot succeed if the CEO does not believe in it, senior managers do not support it, middle managers resist it and employees do not understand its purpose.
The transformation must begin at the top.
Concluded.
Disclaimers: Pictures in these blogs are taken from free resources at Pexels, Pixabay, Unsplash, and Google. Credit is given where available. If a copyright claim is lodged, we shall remove the picture with appropriate regrets.
For most blogs, I research from several sources which are open to public. Their links are mentioned under references. There is no intent to infringe upon anyone’s copyrights. If, any claim is lodged, it will be acknowledged and duly recognized immediately.
